My Ranking of All 3 Ari Aster Horror Films Ranked from Great to Tremendous

 My Ranking of All 3 Ari Aster Horror Films Ranked from Great to Tremendous

3. Beau is Afraid

2. Midsommar

1. Hereditary

Disgusting the Canceled Jack Black Green Lantern Film.

 

Disgusting the Canceled Jack Black  Green Lantern Film. 

Now we all know that in 2011 Ryan Reynolds starred in Green Lantern and this was a film that was really bad because it made Jordan AKA Green Lantern a comedic character but believe it or not the film was going to be far far dumber than the one that we ended up getting. So let's dive in into the now canceled Jack Black's Green Lantern. 

Now originally the storyline was going to be about this guy Judd Platt yep that was the character's name it wasn't how Jordan or guy Garner it was Judd Platt and this guy was supposed to work at a furniture Store with his friend named Seth and then Judd go that side and see a spaceship crash down in the dying pilot was Abin Sur. Who tells him to become Green Lantern and the ring picks him and apparently rather than being responsible Judd was going to use the ring to make his life easier by trying to Careem to go on date with him and she does. Then he was supposed to go to OA with the rest of the Green Lanterns which included Tomra Ray- Kilwag and Sinestro who in this film was supposed to be a pretty boy which means he was a neat freak. Then they trained him by using Muppet style characters to explain how the ring works. Then Sonestro turns on them and wants to conquer Earth and destroy it with Pikachu and It is up to Judd Platt to become Green Lantern. Now I have to say this storyline might have been dumber than Thornland and Thunder because Thor Love and Thunder  had some ridiculous things throughout that film. But somehow this storyline was going to be far far more dumber than the storyline we got in Thor Love and Thunder. 

Casting- now the actor that they were going to use for Green Lantern is Jack Black I got to say that would have been the dumbest superhero casting choice of all time to be honest it might have rivaled George Clooney's Batman in terms of the dumbest cast Choice ever because Jack Black is not a bad actor Now this is going to be a weird idea and as bad as it would be I would say Kumail Nanjiani I would able to take more seriously because he's skinnier. To be honest I think other actors like Paul Rudd, Ke Huy Quan, Coleman Domingo, Jeremy Renner, even Harrison Ford as Dumb as it would be. At least I could take all these actors seriously as Green Lantern. But Jack Black is way too fat to be Green Lantern and you won't be able to take his performance seriously because of how goofy and silly he would be as the character. Plus I don't think I can take Jack Black seriously in a Green Lantern suit. It'll just look really weird and really dumb. 

Green Lantern- Now let's talk about the character of Green Lantern now the guy that was going to become Green Lantern was not Hal Jordan. It was actually going to be Judd Platt and he was supposed to be betrayed as a complete idiot, a complete jackass. So imagine if Randy from South Park became a Green Lantern and acted like a complete idiot. That's basically what you get because this guy would have eaten coyote heads. He would have cracked a lot of dumb jokes then to be honest I think it would have been a million times more dumber than Thor was and Thor love and thunder and you all know how much I hated what the MCU did to Thor. But I think this would have been far dumber than anything that the MCU has ever done to their main characters. There was going to be a scene of him watching Muppet Like characters singing an educational song about the Green Lantern rain and that would have been so dumb. To be honest I don't think you could take this interpretation of Green Lantern because of how much of an idiot he would be throughout the film. Also to be honest I think this character would have been far dumber than smart Hulk from the MCU and you all know how much I hated that in Avengers endgame I thought that was really weird. Also again they'll just betray Green Lanterns like Randy Marsh again this is like Randy got the Great Lantern ring and acted like a complete jackass That's essentially what Green Lantern would have been like in this film. Then there's going to be a scene during the climax of Green Lantern where he's going to lie himself on fire and barf on people which would have been so dumb. 

Kilowog- Nike would have been the same like he was in the comics in terms of training Hal Jordan like in the comics. But he was going to be like a frat boy like Judd Platt´s friend and just be a complete clown the entire movie and that's not what Kilowog is about to be. He's supposed to be like a smart-ass, kind of like the thing from Fantastic Four like a tough guy. But in this film he was going to be a joke ster throughout the film and just be a complete weirdo who enjoys partying and dating women and that would have been really dumb. There's going to be a scene where Kilowog uses a machine gun and then Green Lantern aka Judd Platt was going to block the bullets by using Green secret servants agents which would have been really dumb and really weird. 

Sinestro- Now for some weird reason in this version of the film Sinestro was going to be a net freak and a pretty boy because apparently he didn't want to be dirty he wants to stay clean and perfect and then he turns bad and tries to destroy everyone on Earth. So with this film Sinestro was going to be the villain. But it'll still be stupid because Sinestro is not a pretty boy, he's just pure evil. Also the way he gets defeated was going to be dumb I wish I made this up but apparently I'm not even joking he was about to get defeated when Green Lantern conjured up an imperfect variant of Sinestro who is ugly who is wrinkled Apparently the Imperfect variant of Sinestro was going to like what Gunk into the original Sinestro´s mouth and rip his hair off Yeah I'm not making here that's about to be the big climactic battle against Green Lantern and Sinestro and it would have been really stupid. Even if they did get someone like Mark Strong, the script will give him jack shit to do. To be honest I think this might be worse than Mr Freeze in Batman Robin in terms of taking a really great character and making him dumb because you all know that Mr Freeze is known to be the worst comic to movie adaptations of a Batman villain ever. But I think this variant of Sinestro would have been dumber. Not to mention you want to know how Sinestro was going to be defeated in this movie and I wish I was joking about this. Apparently he was going to get beaten up by a bunch of baby yellow birds. Yeah and I'm not even kidding here that was the climatic battle against Green Lantern and Sinestro and it would have been a million times worse than the scene in Ant-Man And The Wasp Quantum Mania where Kang get attacked by ants and you all know how much I think that is the dumbest moments in the Ant-Man Trilogy. But this would have been far far worse because at least with the scene of Kang getting beaten up by ants at least it's relevant to the story this would have been like the movie watching you over the head with a hammer with its stupidity. 

The Muppet scene- now originally They're supposed to be a scene of Judd Platt Aka Green Lantern Watching a puppet show of Muppets explaining the Green Lanterns power ring and yeah I am not kidding that was literally a scene that was going to happen this movie and They could have made it more dumber if they tried because this scene would have rivaled all of the jokes and Thor love and thunder in terms of its stupidity. Also again you all know how much I think Thor Love And Thunder has some really bad jokes. But somehow The Muppet scene would make every dumb MCU joke in Thor Love and Thunder. It looks like the humor in the Deadpool movies. That is how bad The Muppet scene would have been in this film.

The WTF final battle- Now the climax in this movie was going to be so fucking dumb because Sinestro he's about to destroy Planet Earth by using Pikachu yeah I wish I was Kidding the climax was supposed to be Judd Platt Aka Green Lantern Trying to take down a giant Pikachu and saving all of humanity by conjuring up Superman and have him spin around The Earth to reverse time to have the giant Pikachu move away from Earth Which causes a couple of earthquakes and that's when Greenlantern was going to lie himself on fire and Barf on People attacking each other And no I'm not even fucking kidding now it's about to be the climax and then Sonestro gets defeated he gets put on trial in the movie ends with With Judd Platt going to OA with his girlfriend Careem. To be honest this would have been the dumbest climax of any comic book film and you won't know how much I think the climax in Thor Love and the Thunder is ridiculous with all the children fight all those monsters but somehow this climax would have been far far more dumber than the climax in that film because at least despite how silly the climax in Thor Love And Thunder was I was at least entertained by. But this I'm going to tell you I don't think I will last a minute in that theater if I saw The final battle. I would literally say fuck this movie I'm out of here. That's how dumb the climax would have been. Also again Sinestro getting beaten up by baby birds I can't get that thought out of my head without saying what the fuck would that supposed to be. To be honest I think this would have been one of the worst climaxes out of any comic book movie ever made.

Conclusion- To be honest it's actually quite fascinating that we almost got a Green Lantern movie That was going to be more dumber than Batman and Robin because a lot of stuff that they were going to do would have been really fucking ridiculous. Especially that whole Muppet scene with them singing an educational song about how the Green Lantern ring works that would go down as well the dumbest comic book movie moments of all time. Also the acting would have been really bad especially from Jack Black who would just be playing himself again. I don't think you could take Jack Black seriously as Green Lantern or a comic book character in general.  Now this is going to be a weird idea and as bad as it would be I would say Kumail Nanjiani I would be able to take him more seriously because he's skinnier. To be honest I think other actors like Paul Rudd, Ke Huy Quan, Coleman Domingo, Jeremy Renner, even Harrison Ford as Dumb as it would be. At least I could take all these actors seriously as Green Lantern. Also the jokes would have been dumber than the jokes in Thor Love and Thunder and you all know how much I think the jokes in Thor Love and Thunder are so dumb and ridiculous.  But somehow this movie we're going to have a worse jokes than that film. because the film would just constantly bash you over the head with its stupidity Also the character of Sinestro was going to be a pretty boy which that would have been so ridiculous I think it would have surpassed Arnold's Mr freeze from Batman and Robin in terms of stupidity because making Sinestro a pretty boy is so fucking ridiculous because they just would have made him into a dumb comedic villain. Also the action sequences would have been really bad especially with that final battle where Sinestro gets beaten up by baby fucking yellow birds and yes it is surprisingly dumber than the scene in Ant-Man And The Wasp Quantum Mania  where Kang gets beaten up by ants. But somehow again having baby yellow birds beat up Sinestro and it'll go down with the dumbest climax of any comic book Film and again the whole thing of Green Lantern using the ring to create Superman to fly in Reverse to save the world would have been really dumb and so ridiculous. Also the character of Judd Platt was going to be a complete idiot. He will go into the ring to make his life easier so it's basically as if Randy Marsh from South Park got the Green Lantern ring and being a complete jackass using it for stupid shit and attention. Although apparently during the climax Green Lantern lighting himself on fire and barfing on people which would have been so stupid and I don't think anyone wants to  see Green Lantern throw up in general it'll just be so stupid and so ridiculous. Now I will say this I am so happy that we got the 2011 Green Lantern movie because that's bad at that one it could have been worse we could have gotten this interpretation of the film with Jack Black as Green Lantern barfy on someone so in general again it is fascinating how we almost got a more dumber variation of the Green Lantern film just with a different actor. So this was really fun to discuss this really weird and really dumb variation of the Green Lantern film that was going to Star Jack Black. 

Ranking Everything I Watched in September From Worst to Best

 Ranking Everything I Watched in September From Worst to Best

28. The Runner

27. Passenger

26. Batman The Killing Joke

25. Firestarter 2022

24. Forst/Nixon

23. Trap

22. Black Widow

21. Jared Leto Hollywood's Darkest Secret

20. The Mummy 1932

19. Good Time

18. Amber Alert

17. Kundun

16. The Phoenician Scheme

15. Frankenstein 1932

14. Oddity

13. Dunkirk

12. American Gangster

11. Young Frankenstein

10. Godzilla Minus One

9. Orphan First Kill

8. Platoon

7. The Invisible Man 1933

6. 12 Angry Men 1957

5. Send Help

4. Overlord

3. The First Omen

2. Juror #2 

1. Wild At Heart

Here is My Movie Idea for A 12 Angry Man Remake

 

Here is My Movie Idea for A 12 Angry Man Remake

Now it comes to the original 1957 12 Angry Men film. I always enjoyed it. I think it's one of the best films of the 1950s. Now I haven't seen the 1997 remake of that film. But what I have heard of it is that it is relatively the same just with different actors. But I feel like this movie should be remade again with newer actors And one there are more well known because the ones in the 1957 film were actors I never heard of but they were really good as the characters and I feel like If there is newer actors I think The chemistry of the characters  And the actor would be just as stronger Like in the 1957 movie. 

Now the storyline would be relatively the same. You'll have this group of jury members who are trying to figure out if the guy who killed his father is innocent or should be guilty. He should be sentenced to death or jail. Now they can't wait to change it up as well by adding some new stuff in it but the general idea is that it's about 12 guys trying to determine if a guy is innocent or not. 

Now the cast is very interesting because I think the cast should be Actors that are really well known and maybe some Oscar winning actors Would be really interesting plus it'll give like The audience is a way to discuss their favorite performance and and if they know the actor from a different movie they'll be like oh I know this actor from a different film and they work well with this other actor in this film. 

Now as for Juror #1 In the original film he has shown to be really calm and intelligent even when things got really heated he was able to control his emotions. He also spoke really calmly. So I think the actor who should Play Juror #1 Should be Jude Law because he has such a calm and collective voice even when he plays a villain like Pitch Black and Rise of the Guardians he does have that calm soothing nature to his performance. Also I can see a scene where jury number one tried to get Juror #3 to control his temper and I think the interactions during that whole scene would be really awesome. I also think a lot of people would praise Jude Law's performance. 

Next is Juror #2 Now in the original film Juror #2 Was shown to be very shy and because he didn't really feel like talking to the other jury members in the room even though he did say a few things to the other main characters he was definitely the most somber person in the room. Now the actor I think Paul Dano should play Juror #2 because if you've seen him in  films like Spaceman where he played Hanus the giant spider there are moments throughout that movie where he did give a really somber performance as that character. Now I can see him really intense and show where Juror #3 yells at the rest of the Juror and he asked during number two well what do you think? Do you think the guy is guilty or do you think? Then Juror #2 said I don't know. It can lead to a really powerful and really nail biting moment in the film. Also I think him and Jude Law would play off each other perfectly. I also think a lot of people would praise Paul Daniels performance for the powerful and really suspenseful Performance he has given. 

Now Juror #3 In the original film was shown to have a violent temper. He would yell at the rest of the jury believing that the guy is guilty. For the actor who should play this character I'm going to go with Colman Domingo because if you see them in Michael as Joe Jackson there are some moments what he does raise his voice and loses this temper so that performance does make a good choice to play Jurur #3 Because there could be a lot of intense moments where jewelry number three loses his temper and he says Juror #1 What do you mean he is innocent? He clearly did something bad  because he murdered his own father that means the guy is not innocent. The bastard is obviously the killer and he had to be sentenced to the electric chair for the bad thing he committed by killing his own father. So I say he's guilty so there we watch him get the death penalty so we can get this jury over with. I think a lot of people would praise that moment because of Colon Domingo's nail biting and suspenseful performance as the character. I think he and Jude Law would play off each other perfectly. 

Now Juror #4 Was my favorite character in the film because he was the one that believed that the guy is possibly innocent and he was really intelligent and he had a lot of  moments in that original film. Now as for the actor I'm going to go with Ethan Hawke because he has given some really terrific performances and stuff like Moon Knight, The Black Phone, Gautica, First Reformed. Also there could be a really incredible moment where Juror #4 says to the rest of the jury well all this way someone witnessed the murder and saw the guy with a knife stabbing the victim. I think a lot of people would really like the scene because of Ethan Hawke's brilliant and powerful performance. Also I think he and Jude Law would have amazing chemistry with each other. 

Next is Juror #5  in the original film. He explained that he grew up in the swamps of town where all the violence happens but he was also really intelligent and believes that the guy is possibly innocent. Now as for the actor who should play Juror #5 I'm going to go with Ke Huy Quan  is one of my favorite actors of all time and he is an Oscar Winning actor and he has given a lot of terrific performances  in Indiana Jones and The Temple of Doom, the Goonies, Everything Everywhere All At Once. To be honest I think a lot of people will praise Ke Huy Quan's performance. To be honest that could be a lot of interesting moments with Juror #5 Like for example there could be a scene where he mentions to the jury that the guy could have possibly killed his dad out of anger and he says well he might have had so much rage. He was bottling up and he had laid all out but maybe he caused him to go over the edge. So he might be innocent. I think he and Jude Law will have terrific chemistry with each other. 

Next is Juror #6 Now in the film he was the voice of Raven and he was trying to keep everyone calm just in case anything bad happens or any fights or arguments between the rest of the jury. The actor I'm going to go with is Lewis Pullman because if you see him in Thunderbolts* He was  the emotional core of that film as the character of Bob, how he was the voice of reason and I think he can bring that type of performance. I think there could be a lot of interesting moments with this character like there could be a thing where Juror #3 is arguing with jury number five and then Juror #6 Say okay let's all calm down and think this through. We are here to determine if the guy is innocent or guilty. We are not to cause a riot in this room. I think it could be one of the more intense and emotional moments because he's trying to get everyone to calm down and try to keep everything under control. I think a lot of people will praise Lewis Pullman's performance. Also I think the chemistry between him and Jude Law would be incredible. 

Next is Juror #7 Now in the film the character was shown to be very selfish; he only cares about a baseball game and he just wanted to get the jury trial over with. I think the actor I'm going to go with is my all-time favorite actor Paul Rudd because he has delivered a lot of tremendous performances and stuff like the MCU as Ant-Man, Mute, The Fundamentals Of Caring, Friendship. Among many other films. To be honest it would be kind of fun to see Paul Rudd play a selfish character because the only time he did play a selfish character is in dinner for Schmucks Where character Tim Conrad kind of treats Steve Carell’s characterberry like trash by training him as if he was an idiot. To be honest I think he is the right choice to play Juror #7. Also I think a lot of people would praise Paul Rudd's performance. Although there could be a scene where it says to the jury Look it's 4:00 we've been been here for almost 7 hours and I just want to go home sit on the couch and watch a baseball game so I don't have to deal with this boring Court thing we have to do so as I get this over with. I also think both him and Jude Law would have amazing chemistry with each other. 

Next is Juror #8 Now in the film he is shown to be super intelligent and he wants to prove that the guy might be innocent of possibly killing his father. The actor I'm going to go with is Oscar Isaac because he has given some really amazing performances like in Ex Machina, Annihilation, Frankenstein, and The Card Counter. I think people would praise Oscar Isaac's performance in the film. Also there could be a lot of interesting moments with Juror #8 For example there could be a scene where he examines the knife and says this knife is the same knife that the guy used to kill his father and I believe that we can all have a fair vote. Or there could be a scene of him saying okay we're going to vote again and we'll see what the outcome is. I think he and Jude Law would have amazing chemistry with one another. 

Next is Juror #9 Now in the original film he was shown to be very humble because he really cared about everyone and even when things got really intense he knew how to control his emotions and why to figure out if the guy who killed his father was guilty or innocent. The actor  I'm going with is Nicolas Cage because he has given so many terrific and incredible performances and stuff like Willy's Wonderland, Color Out Of Space, Rumble Fish, Pig, and Longlegs. I think a lot of people would praise Nicholas Cage's performance. Also there could be a lot of really powerful and really interesting moments like for example Juror #9 says to the jury look i believe that the guy is possibly innocent, so let´s vote again.  see if we have the right answer as to to determine if the guy should be sent to jail or be presumed innocent. I think both him and Jude Law will have amazing chemistry. 

Next is Juror #10 Now in the original film he was shown to be very xenophobic and he was really quick to anger. Now as for the actor i'm going to pick is going to be a Christian Bale because this is an actor who has given a lot of tremendous performances in a lot of stuff like in Thor Love and Thunder, The Dark Knight Trilogy, Empire Of The Sun, American Psycho. Although I think a lot of people would praise Christian Bale's performance because he's that great of an actor. Also that could be a really intense scene where Juror #10 is talking to the rest of the jury and the others tried to tell him to relax and he says no I'm not going to relax because I believe that the guy killed his father out of mouth and he should be sentenced to death because he's a deranged psycho who is guilty not innocent. Also I think he and Jude Law would have amazing chemistry. 

Next is Juror #11 Now in the film he was very humble; he believed that everyone's vote should count and everyone should have a stay of what they think could have happened during that murder. Now for the actor that should play the character I'm going to go with Jeremy Renner because he has given a lot of tremendous performances and stuff like the MCU as Hawkeye, The Town, Wind River,Arrival, and Wake Up Dead Man A Knives Out Mystery. I also think he can give that really raw and really captivating performance as this character and I think a lot of people would praise Jeremy Renner's performance. Also there could be a scene where #11 Says to the rest of the jury what we all need to decide the final verdict so how about we vote again in secret and then I'll read them out loud And that way we can figure out which sign is right, the not guilty side or the guilty side. I think that scene would work because it would show that #11 Is wanting to hear everyone's side of the story to prove that some people can believe one thing but some people can believe the other thing. I think both him and Jude Law would play off each other perfectly. 

Finally there is Juror #12 In the original film was shown to be really distracted but at the same time he wanted to figure out if the guy who killed his dad was innocent or guilty of the crime. And there were points in the film where he was really smart. I think the actor that I would go with is Ewan Mcgregor because he has given some great performances like Big Fish, Doctor Sleep, Christopher Robin, The Island, Jack The Giant Slayer. I think a lot of people would praise Ewan McGregor´s performance. There could be a really interesting scene where #12 Says to Juror #1 So what do you think could have happened during the murder with the guy and the dan and how would you believe how it would start. I think that would be a really powerful scene because you get to have a sort of like the characters debating what the murders intentions were by killing his dad. Also I think a lot of people would praise the scene because of the performances. I think he and Jude Law would have amazing chemistry with each other. 

Now as for the director, I think the person who should direct this film is Alex Garland because this guy can direct really intense and powerful films like Ex-Machina, Men Annihilation, Warfare. So I think he can pull off really intense and some really nail-biting suspense between the jury all arguing all the theories of what people might have heard of the murder like their interpretations of what could have happened during the murder and then come up with their own theories about how it could have happened. I think Alex Garland is a perfect choice because he can direct this remake perfectly. 

So in conclusion this was really fun to do and I think 12 Angry Men should be remade for the new generation with new actors and it can still have the same storyline and i think some of the actors I cast or really interesting because you would have some really Well known actors like Jude Law, Colman Domingo, Paul Rudd, Paul Dano, Ke Huy Quan, Christian Bale, Oscar Isaac, Ewan McGregor, Ethan Hawke, Jeremy Renner, Nicolas Cage, and Lewis Pullman. I think a lot of people would praise their performances as the members of the jury. I think the director Alex Garland who directed Men, Ex Machina Warfare, Annihilation. Will be the perfect choice to direct this movie because He does that terrific job of creating dark and suspenseful moments in his films. I think a lot of people would praise his directing, especially people who are fans of his previous movies like Warfare, Men and especially Ex Machina. Also I think a lot of people would like this  remake because of the acting and the directing.

Top 20 Actors Who Can Play The Major

 Top 20 Actors Who Can Play The Major

20. Ben Kingsley

19. Josh Brolin

18. Liev Schreiber

17. Hugh Grant

15. Richard E Grant 

14. Kelsey Grammer 

13. Idris Elba

12. Hugh Jackman

11. Billy Bob Thornton

10. Ethan Hawke

9. J.K. Simmons

8. Tommy Lee Jones

7. Coleman Domingo

6. Christopher Walken

5. Gary Oldman

4. Vincent D'Onofrio

3. Denzel Washington

2. Christian Bale

1. Jack Nicholson

Top 10 Christian Bale Films

 Top 10 Christian Bale Films

10. Thor Love And Thunder

9. American Hustle

8. The Prestige

7. The Dark Knight Rises

6. Amsterdam

5. Ford Versus Ferrari

4. Empire Of The Sun

3. 3:10 To Yuba

2. Batman Begins

1. The Dark Knight

Here is My Movie Review of 12 Angry Men

 

Here is my Movie Review of 12 Angry Men

Now when it comes to this movie I always really enjoyed it in fact it really reminds me of the film Juror #2 from 2024 because both movies take place in Courthouse and both of them have the characters determine if someone is innocent or guilty of the crime that they have committed. 

Now the storyline is really incredible and very simple basically you have these 12 jury members and they have to determine if this one guy who killed someone is guilty or innocent and some of the jury believes that he is innocent well some others believe that he should be sentenced to death and should be guilty for the bad thing he has committed that being murder and they have to vote on whether  the boy is innocent or guilty of killing his father and that's basically what happens it's very simple and very easy to follow. 

Now the acting in this movie is incredible because even though this came out in 1957 the acting still holds up today and you can tell all these actors had a lot of fun playing these characters In fact a lot of people say this is one of the best acted films of all time and I agree with them this film is up there with the acting in Appaloosa as one of the best acted films of all time. 

However the absolute big standout of the entire film is Martin Balsam as Juror #1 Because you give such an emotional and really powerful and captivating performance as this character. Now the character of Juror #1 Is shown to be really calm and he wants to prove to the rest of the jury that the guy might be innocent even when he has argued with the other members of the Jury. He is still able to keep his composure and temper down even when things get really intense. The scenes with Juror #1 is incredible whether  he is meeting the rest of the jury and discussing if the guy is guilty or innocent of the murder for him trying to get the rest of the jury to calm down and it does lead to some really heart pounding and some really iconic moments in the film. The chemistry between him and John Fiedler, Lee J. Cobb, E.G. Marshall, Jack Klugman, Edward Binns, Jack Warden, Henry Fonda, Joseph Sweeney, Ed Begley, George Voskivec and Robert Webber are magnificent. 

John Fiedler Either way gives one of the most somber and one more mellow performances in the film as Juror #2 because he does such a glorious job of playing this character who doesn't talk all that much because he gets really nervous but he also wants to try to figure out if the boy who killed his own father is guilty or innocent. The character of Juror #2 is shown to be very closed off and really shy but he also, much like the rest of the jury, wants to figure out if this guy is innocent or guilty of killing his own father. The scenes with Juror #2 are Probably the most nerve-wracking moments in the film. Either it is him not wanting to talk at first or him trying to say that the boy who killed his own father is possibly guilty. It does lead to some really somber and some really dramatic moments in the film. The chemistry between him and Martin Balsam is exhilarating. 

Lee J. Cobb  gives the most intense and suspenseful performances in the film because you can tell that he really dived into this character who has a live anger. He just wants to figure out if the guy is guilty of killing his father so the jury can be over. Now the character Juror #3 is shown to be very hot tempered and gets mad really easily and he believes that the boy is guilty for killing his father and he just wants to get the jury over so he can leave. The Scenes with Juror #3 Are probably some of the most violent and some of the most hard pounding moments in the film especially when he questions the other jury members of why they believe that the boy might be innocent or him causing a riot in the office of all the juries attacking each other and jury number one that has to try to break it up it does lead to some really intense and some really heavy moments throughout the film. The chemistry between him and Martin Balsam is perfect. 

E.G. Marshall Plays Juror #4 In the film and out of all the performances in the film he is probably my favorite because he plays the intelligent one of the jury really well and I can tell that he is having a lot of fun as this character. Now the character of Juror #4 Is probably my favorite character because this is a character that focuses on the facts of what possibly could have happened during the murder and tries to figure out much like the rest of the jury if the guy is guilty or innocent.  The scenes with juror #4 Are probably some of my favorite moments in the film whether it is him doubting Juror #8 ideologies of what could have happened during the murder. Or him voting not guilty against the other 11 Jurors. It does lead to some really iconic and really suspenseful moments between the characters Throughout the film. The chemistry between him and Martin Balsam is magnificent.

Jack Klugman Plays Juror #5 In the film, his performance is brilliant because you can tell that he is having a lot of fun as this character. He gives such a riveting and terrific performance in this film. Now the character of Juror #5 Is really interesting because he is someone who grew up in the violent slums of town where all the violence in Mayhem happened and he wants much like the rest of the jury to figure out if this guy is innocent or guilty of committing murder. The scenes with Juror #5 are terrific Especially the scene of him talking about what it's like to grow up in the slums of the town witnessing all the violence or him trying to tell the other jury members that the guy might be innocent. It does lead to some of the most brilliant and some of the most entertaining moments of the entire film. The chemistry between him and Martin Balsam is spectacular. 

 Edward Binns Plays Juror #6 In the film and his performance is really exhilarating because he does such a glorious job with his performance because he plays the voice of reason for the Jury. You can tell that he was having so much heart and emotion to this character and you can tell that he is having a lot of fun in this film. Now the character of Juror #6 Is really incredible because he is kind of like the voice of reason in the film, how he wants to prove that the guy might be innocent or guilty but he also wants to try to keep the other jurors from getting into a massive argument and start turning against each other. The scenes with Juror #6 are probably some of the most  Captivating moments in the film especially the scene where Juror #6 Tells Juror #3 To respect # 9 Because he is elderly and it is one of the most powerful moments of the entire film and Or him in the rest of the Jerry retrain the walk to figure out what was the person's motive who lived across in the apartment it does lead to some really incredible and probably some of the best moments in the film. The  chemistry between him and Martin Balsam is marvelous because you can tell both of these actors are having a lot of fun. 

Jack Warden plays Juror #7 In the film he also gives the second most intense performance of the entire film because he does such a tremendous job of playing this narcissistic selfish member of the jury. Now the character of #7 As shown to be really selfish even though he wants to determine if the guy who killed his father is guilty or innocent but he's more concerned with a baseball game rather than getting the jury done. Now the scenes with Juror #7 Are tremendous whether it is him arguing with the jury about wanting to get this trial over with or him talking about the baseball game; it does lead to some really heart pounding and some really brutal moments throughout the film. The chemistry between him and Martin Balsam is brilliant. 

Henry Fonda plays Juror #8 In the film and he probably gives one the most exhilarating and perfect performances in the film because you could tell he's having a lot of fun playing this very smart and very determine character who wants to prove to the other jury that the guy really did kill his father by stabbing him with the knife and trying to figure out if he is guilty or innocent of what he did. The scenes with Juror #8 Are probably some of my favorite moments in the film especially the scene where he's showing the other juries the knife and drawing out a picture of how could the murder could have went down with the guy and his father and that whole scene of him and the rest of the jury's fighting each other If the guy should be Send it to death or be innocent it does lead to a lot of memorable and terrific and Intelligent moments in the film. The chemistry between him and Martin Balsam is spectacular. 

Joseph Sweeney plays Juror #9 In the film And his performance is probably one of the most heartwarming and probably one of the most beautiful performances of the entire film because he does such an outstanding job of playing this character who is very thoughtful and really down to earth. Now Juror #9 as a character is shown to be very thoughtful and really nice and he believes that the guy who committed the murderer could be possibly innocent rather than guilty and he wants the rest of the journey to come forward with their answers of what they think. The scene where Ledgery number 9 inmates that he changed his vote because he believed that the guy is innocent is probably one of the most powerful and one of the most captivating moments in the film. Or him arguing with the rest of the jury to figure out who is right And it does lead to some really powerful and some really remarkable moments in the film. The chemistry between him and Martin Balsam  is incredible. 

Ed Begley plays Juror #10 In the film and his performance is really tremendous In this film and you could tell that he was having a lot of fun playing this xenophobic wow mouth who essentially believes that the guy is not innocent he clearly committed the murder of his dad. Now the character of Juror #10 Is shown to be very xenophobic is quick to anger he wants to get this jury over with because he just believes that the guy who killed his father is automatically guilty and should be sentenced to death. The scenes with Juror #10 Are probably some of the hardest moments to watch. Either it is him delivering that Prejudice speech or him trying to cause the other juries to attack each other and try to prove that the guy is guilty. It does lead to some really heart pounding and brutal moments in the film. The chemistry between him and Martin Balsam is perfect. 

George Voskivec plays Juror #11 In the film, he gives a really fun and fantastic performance as this character because you could tell that he is having a lot of fun as this character. Now the character of Juror #11 Is really interesting because he believes that everyone should count and he wants everyone to have a say and what they think might have happened during the murder to determine if the guy is guilty or innocent. The scenes with Juror #11 Are incredible Especially when he tries to testify against the old man to determine if he was really during the murder. Or during the final debate when he still votes not guilty it still leads to some really incredible and iconic moments in the film. The chemistry between him and Martin Balsam is extraordinary. 

Now the very last performance is of course Robert Webber Who plays the 12th and final jury member which is Juror #12 and he does a stellar job with his performance and you can tell that he is having a lot of fun as this character. Now the character of Juror #12 Is shown to be either way distracted but he, much like the rest of the jury, wants to figure out if the guy is innocent or guilty of killing his father and wants to have a final conclusion to determine what the outcome will be. The scenes with Juror #12 Are really interesting because there are so many incredible moments with this character whether it is him watching Juror #3 finally says  guilty in him and the rest of the juries leaving the room or him arguing with the wetness and questioning him if he really saw everything play out with the murder it does lead to some really iconic and perfect moments throughout the film. The chemistry between him and Martin Balsam is perfect. 

However the best thing about this movie is the directing by Sidney Lumet  because what I love about his directing is that he does a Stellar job of disgusting the subject of what a jury does how how they determine if a person is innocent or guilty of the crime they have committed and they're literally a lot of arguments because some people will believe that the guy is guilty while others believe that the person might be innocent. I also like how he develop all these characters and give them different personalities for example Juror #3 is known to be really angry and believe that the person is guilty Juror # 9 It's shown to be very humble and soft-spoken and believed that the person is innocent. Or someone like Juror #10 is shown to be very xenophobic and doesn't believe that the person is innocent and constantly argues with the other members of the jury. So I think he did a stellar job of developing these characters. I also like how he shows how dark a jury can get in terms of people getting riled up and they might call they fight to break out.  So now the interesting thing is how he discussed it. So overall I think he did a stellar job directing this film.

So in conclusion I still really love this film simply because of the simple storyline which is of course people trying to figure out if a guy who committed murder is either guilty or innocent and while the concept is pretty simple the film executes it perfectly. But the thing I really like is all the performances the standout performances for me are from Martin Balsam as Juror #1 because he gives one of the most captivating and one of the best performances in the film. Also E.G. Marshall as Juror #4 Is probably my favorite performance of the film. It does a glorious job of giving this character so much heart but also a lot of brilliant moments throughout the film. Also John Fiedler the film as Juror #2 give a really terrific and really beautiful performance because he did such a great job of playing this quiet and timid jury who doesn't like talking that much and likes to keep it to himself. At all you can tell that he is having a lot of fun as this character. Also the rest of the actors are incredible. Also every single moment is incredible whether you're talking about Jury #8 talking about the knife and comparing it or Juror #3 starting arguments with the other members of the jury it does lead to some really iconic and some really amazing moments in the film. I highly recommend you watch this film especially if you like courtroom drama films like Juror #2 with Nicholas Hoult from 2024. I'm  sure you're going to like this one as well. I give this film a 10/10.